Performance management: an art and a science?
By Steve Shellabear (January 2005 Issue)
0 Comments ![]()
Article Rating: 



Email to a friend | Print Version
The primary purpose of performance management is to develop skills and competencies at individual and group level so that the organisation benefits. It is a continuous proactive process focusing on planning, acting, measuring and reviewing performance. Used effectively it will enable an organisation to forward plan and develop its staff. Used ineffectively it is often reduced to an appraisal ‘system’ comprising a series of forms completed once a year by over-worked managers in a rush to get it done so they can get on with their normal tasks.
An ideal performance management system is likely to have the following elements within it.
* The vision, objectives and targets of the organisation are aligned with individual performance measures for all levels of staff.
* Objectives and targets include qualitative, quantitative and learning goals.
* Performance targets are specific, measurable, achievable and challenging.
* Real-time coaching is factored in to uplift performance and maintain quality standards.
* Regular and meaningful assessment of performance takes place for the organisation, teams and individuals.
* Managers have access to real-time monitoring systems to facilitate self-management.
* Regular briefing sessions and procedures enable managers and staff to keep up to date and respond to changes.
* Feedback loops and troubleshooting procedures are designed and used.
* Adequate quality control procedures and mechanisms are utilised.
Classical management theorists have long argued that having an efficient organisation is primarily a technical, rational process. While there may be some recognition of a human being’s need, essentially the goal is to produce a machine-like operation that achieves targets. People are seen as cogs in a wheel. Frederick Taylor, the pioneer of what is now known as scientific management, is probably the most well known and much maligned author of such a system. He was extremely influential in the first half of the 20th century and the application of his methods increased productivity enormously in shop floor environments. Unfortunately, Taylor’s methods had the effect of reducing workers to unthinking automatons.
We have only displayed above the opening paragraph of this article. If you are a TJ subscriber, login now so you can download a PDF of this article in full, free of charge. For non-subscribers the PDF can be purchased for £9.00 see the "Buy Now" Option above.
Readers Comment
Be the first to comment on this news story
Buy Now
You can download this article free by subscribing and logging in as a Full TJ member
Price: £9.00
Articles from this Issue
- Finding a new job: the trainer's role in outplacement
- Motivation revisited
- Development challenges: looking at the future
- Trainer development: understanding reflective practice
- Hot pod learning
- Management theorists: thinkers for the 21st century?
- Focus opinion
- Performance management: an art and a science?
- Leading edge: managing people through directing, delegating and coaching
- Riding the waves of change
- Performance management of dispersed teams
- Netcheck
- Letter from Jamaica
- Spotlight on Jo Richler
- What is Learning Needs Anaylsis?
