Breadcrumb

You are in:

Schools as organisations

peter-honey-lg.gif

Peter Honey

21 Jul 2010

A recent article1 in The Psychologist made the interesting point that schools are the first formal organisation most of us are subjected to and that our memories of school are more about the process we experienced than about the content we learned. 

The authors of the article go on to say that the impact of schools as places where we learn how organisations work, and our place in them, is largely neglected. This set me thinking, not for the first time, about how my experience of school has contaminated my view of organisations and my work as a management trainer. Having pondered this, my sad conclusion is that I have never fully recovered from the damage (hopefully, unintentional) done by my schooling. Let me give you some examples.

All the schools I attended were fiercely hierarchical and non-democratic. I never remember being consulted about anything and I was left in no doubt that it paid to be compliant and deferential to those above me. The head teacher of my secondary school was an autocrat - you stood to attention in his presence and agreed with everything he said. School prefects (a dozen handpicked sixth formers) had considerable power and the authority to inflict some unpleasant punishments - including caning (this was a long time ago!). 

Under this regime, it never occurred to me that an organisation could be run any other way and this was reinforced when I went on to do two years' National Service as soon as I left school. So, I have struggled with the idea that organisations can function effectively using a collaborative model in which the person at the top doesn't tell you what to do. I have also never shaken off my jaundiced view that organisations are basically bad for people, that they suppress innovation and creativity and reward compliance and conformity. Still, I suppose I have reasons to be grateful - after only six years, I rebelled against working in hierarchical organisations and struck out on my own, never to return.

All the schools I attended were hell-bent on keeping me busy. Bells rang every 40 minutes, signalling that it was time to gather up your books and rush to the next classroom. Every waking moment was scheduled with a rigid timetable of activities -lessons, sports, CCF, scouts, homework and all the rest of it. The underlying assumption (though this only occurred to me later) was that we couldn't be trusted to manage our own time, that life was all about imposing order on what would otherwise degenerate into chaos and anarchy. 

As a consequence, all my life I have rushed around keeping busy and been pretty well incapable of relaxing and doing nothing. For example, I slave away in my garden and it never occurs to me simply to sit in it and read a book. As a trainer, I definitely err on the side of over-structuring activities and not trusting participants to take responsibility for their own learning. I even have hang-ups with reflecting - even though, intellectually, I am totally sold on its value - because thinking about something seems too passive. I've told the joke before about my wife interrupting me whilst I was deep in thought about something laudable and I immediately pretended to be busy by shuffling papers and looking active. For me, keeping busy is an ingrained habit learned from school, where doing nothing was never an option.

All the schools I attended reinforced the idea that learning was a formal process in which you sat and got taught in a classroom. My memory of most lessons, not quite all, was that they were boring, times to endure, times to hide preferably somewhere at the back looking inconspicuous where you wouldn't get picked on and asked a question that you couldn't answer. I only 'discovered' informal, experiential learning 20 years after leaving school (yes, it took me that long to recover!). The idea that everything that happens is a learning opportunity, and that most of these things don't happen in a classroom, was a staggering revelation!

There are more things I learned from my exposure to schools as organisations - about rules, about roles and belonging, about institutional bullying, about punishments exceeding rewards. I hope you'll tell me that I'm out of date and that schools are now conscious of the impact they have on the way we view organisations and learning. Or are they still producing people like me; damaged goods?

Reference

1 "Reimaging our school system" by Anthony Montgomery and Ian Kehoe

Dr Peter Honey FRSA, FCIPD, FIMC is a chartered psychologist and founder of Peter Honey Publications. He can be contacted at peterhoney1@btinternet.com or via www.peterhoney.com 

Comments

  • Comment 1.

    Thx! Quite an eye-opener for me.

    Magali Deplanter - 19 Aug 2010 10:03AM

  • Comment 2.

    I was particularly interested in you brief mention of schools as organisations where we learn about roles and belonging. This does, of course, build on our learning about roles and belonging from pre-school years. i find it fascinating doing 'exploring your self-perception as a group member' exercise with training participants: most mention school, and often the playground, as where they formed this.

    Susy Churchill - 19 Aug 2010 11:17PM

  • Comment 3.

    Peter

    Your article reminded me of another blog which asked "How can I explain HR to an 11 year old?". This was genuine problem for the parent / HR Manager involved. Of course, the problem is that HR is an organisational role. If an 11 year old has no understanding of what an organisations is, how can you explain the role of employment and consequently the role of HR.

    For me, children are customers of the school organisation and cannot truly understand how an organisation works from an internal perpective. It is only when they adopt the role of employee, can they see this role fully.

    Paul Strange - 20 Aug 2010 06:42PM

  • Comment 4.

    Hi Peter,

    I can tell you that schools have changed, particularly the primary variety. His teacher has pioneered the 'discovery' methodology in the school which has been so successful that it will move up the school with the class. Whilst teachers decided the topic, the children decide what they want to learn about it. The teacher provides a range of activities to give them an opportunity to learn and the children pick the one they want to do. If they consistently pick one type of activity, the teacher steers them to a different one to encourage learning in different ways. So my 5 year old has lost none of his toddler questioning, quite a challenge for a mum!

    The school is also big on pupil representation with a school council made up of one or two children from every year group, including reception! So, one month after his fifth birthday, my son was included in the first meeting for the year. Recently when the 'School Improvement Partner' visited, he was included in the meeting which was about pupils giving their views on lessons, particularly IT.

    And there's more - I could go on about the issuing of laptops to 10 & 11 year olds and their use in the classroom and the use of smartboards- but my question is, what happens when these children get into the workplace? How will we adapt so that they can learn in the way to which they've become accustomed.

    I became a school governor to help the school, but I've probably got more out of it myself. I've learnt loads about current learning theory and I struggle to use it in the workplace, and it's taught me a lot about organisations and management. You want to have your thinking challenged? Schools are always looking for governors, why not volunteer and find out for yourselves?

    Julie

    Julie Couchman-Boor - 23 Aug 2010 09:58AM

Please Log-in to post a comment

Read more on TJ's in-depth research project that is exploring how learning and development in organisations is changing and how this will affect the skill sets of L&D practitioners over the next decade.

Latest Blogs

See more